priorsBuilder
Support

Settings

Theme

Explore themes

Mode

Library

Looks borrowed from benchmark sites and products. Themes with a light and a dark version follow your mode.

Bring your own theme

Upload a Priors theme file, or have your agent make one: copy the prompt, tell it the look you want, and upload what it returns. With the Priors skill installed it already knows the format.

Custom themes stay in this browser. They travel inside shared chart links and a page's theme, so others see them as you do.

For the builder, Explore and model pages on this device. Published pages keep the theme their owner picked.

Mode

Zhipu · released 2026-08-18

GLM 5.3

Measured on 204 benchmarks across 2 reasoning efforts.

31.5

#24 of 67 models · best at max

Reasoning efforts in this ranking

max31.5#57 of 149
low23.1#96 of 149

Strengths

  • GLM 5.3
  • Gemini 4 Carbon (#1)
  • Field median
bestField medianFrontierCode 2.0-…Terminal-Bench v4…AA-Briefcase v1.1AutomationBench-AATerminal-Bench-Sc…HLE-DiamondCritPt v2 Hard Su…AA-Omniscience v1…AA-Omniscience v1…GDP.pdf
  1. FrontierCode 2.0-AA15%21.6%#29 of 67
  2. Terminal-Bench v4-AA10%41.9%#14 of 67
  3. AA-Briefcase v1.115%1503#22 of 67
  4. AutomationBench-AA5%62.2%#19 of 67
  5. Terminal-Bench-Science-AA15%9.5%#24 of 67
  6. HLE-Diamond10%17.9%#37 of 67
  7. CritPt v2 Hard Subset10%33.5%#28 of 67
  8. AA-Omniscience v1.1 Accuracy10%32.3%#39 of 67
  9. AA-Omniscience v1.1 Non-hallucination5%61.1%#34 of 67
  10. GDP.pdf5%11.2%#45 of 67

Bars show where GLM 5.3 sits among the 67 ranked models on each benchmark (right is best); the tick is the field median.

Cost and speed

against 67 ranked models

Cost per task

#35 cheapest of 50

$0.52at max

Time per task

#42 quickest of 49

31 minat max

Output speed

#48 fastest of 59

63 tok/sat max

Time to first token

#25 quickest of 59

3.6sat max

Output tokens per task

#40 fewest of 53

119kat max

Time per task: Artificial Analysis · computed, not timed: output tokens per Intelligence Index task divided by output speed, without tool time. Method changed Nov 4, 2026.

API default effort: max, per Artificial Analysis.

Token price

$0.309 per 1M tokens at API prices$0.032 on GLM Coding Pro (新客 ¥538) 闲时

97.0% cache read · 2.50% fresh input · 0.00% cache write · 0.50% output

Assumed mix: no measured T3 Code usage for this model.

This ranking’s benchmarks

10 of 10 measured

agentic

AutomationBench-AA

245 results
  1. #34max of 24562.2%
  2. #88low of 24552.0%

Leader: Gemini 4 Carbon · 77.8%

agentic

AA-Briefcase v1.1

250 results
  1. #41max of 2501503
  2. #109low of 2501185

Leader: Sonnet 5.5 · 1813

reasoning

CritPt v2 Hard Subset

116 results
  1. #58max of 11633.5%
  2. #81low of 11621.5%

Leader: GPT-6 Astra · 72.0%

coding

FrontierCode 2.0-AA

113 results
  1. #54max of 11321.6%
  2. #75low of 11312.7%

Leader: Opus 5.5 · 46.4%

economics

GDP.pdf

243 results
  1. #137max of 24311.2%
  2. #158low of 2438.8%

Leader: Muse Wonder Full · 32.6%

reasoning

HLE-Diamond

152 results
  1. #74max of 15217.9%
  2. #75low of 15217.5%

Leader: Gemini 4 Carbon · 69.1%

knowledge

AA-Omniscience v1.1 Accuracy

122 results
  1. #79max of 12232.3%
  2. #80low of 12231.9%

Leader: Fable 5.1 · 68.4%

knowledge

AA-Omniscience v1.1 Non-hallucination

122 results
  1. #43max of 12261.1%
  2. #79low of 12236.8%

Leader: Gemini 4 Carbon · 95.8%

reasoning

Terminal-Bench-Science-AA

126 results
  1. #57max of 1269.5%
  2. #77low of 1263.8%

Leader: Gemini 4 Carbon · 64.8%

coding

Terminal-Bench v4-AA

241 results
  1. #36max of 24141.9%
  2. #44low of 24134.8%

Leader: Kimi K3.1 · 67.2%

All 204 benchmarks

show 194 more