Support

Settings

Theme

Explore themes

Mode

Library

Looks borrowed from benchmark sites and products. Themes with a light and a dark version follow your mode.

Bring your own theme

Upload a Priors theme file, or have your agent make one: copy the prompt, tell it the look you want, and upload what it returns. With the Priors skill installed it already knows the format.

Custom themes stay in this browser. They travel inside shared chart links and a page's theme, so others see them as you do.

For the builder, Explore and model pages on this device. Published pages keep the theme their owner picked.

Mode

Xiaomi · released 2026-09-21

MiMo V2.6 Flash

Measured on 112 benchmarks.

26.6

#36 of 68 models

Strengths

  • MiMo V2.6 Flash
  • Gemini 4 Carbon (#1)
  • Field median
bestField medianFrontierCode 2.0-…Terminal-Bench v4…AA-Briefcase v1.1AutomationBench-AATerminal-Bench-Sc…HLE-DiamondCritPt v2 Hard Su…AA-Omniscience v1…AA-Omniscience v1…GDP.pdf
  1. FrontierCode 2.0-AA15%21.6%#28 of 68
  2. Terminal-Bench v4-AA10%22.7%#33 of 68
  3. AA-Briefcase v1.115%1487#24 of 68
  4. AutomationBench-AA5%64.1%#18 of 68
  5. Terminal-Bench-Science-AA15%4.3%#34 of 68
  6. HLE-Diamond10%13.7%#45 of 68
  7. CritPt v2 Hard Subset10%29.5%#34 of 68
  8. AA-Omniscience v1.1 Accuracy10%27.2%#46 of 68
  9. AA-Omniscience v1.1 Non-hallucination5%47.8%#45 of 68
  10. GDP.pdf5%9.0%#52 of 68

Bars show where MiMo V2.6 Flash sits among the 68 ranked models on each benchmark (right is best); the tick is the field median.

Cost and speed

against 68 ranked models

Cost per task

cheapest of 50

free

Time per task

#49 quickest of 49

63 min

Output speed

#59 fastest of 60

35 tok/s

Time to first token

#35 quickest of 60

6.3s

Output tokens per task

#43 fewest of 53

132k

Time per task: Artificial Analysis · computed, not timed: output tokens per Intelligence Index task divided by output speed, without tool time. Method changed Nov 4, 2026.

Token price

$0.0076 per 1M tokens at API prices

97.0% cache read · 2.50% fresh input · 0.00% cache write · 0.50% output

Assumed mix: no measured T3 Code usage for this model.

This ranking’s benchmarks

10 of 10 measured

agentic

AutomationBench-AA

245 results
  1. #28default of 24564.1%

Leader: Gemini 4 Carbon · 77.8%

agentic

AA-Briefcase v1.1

250 results
  1. #44default of 2501487

Leader: Sonnet 5.5 · 1813

reasoning

CritPt v2 Hard Subset

116 results
  1. #68default of 11629.5%

Leader: GPT-6 Astra · 72.0%

coding

FrontierCode 2.0-AA

113 results
  1. #53default of 11321.6%

Leader: Opus 5.5 · 46.4%

economics

GDP.pdf

243 results
  1. #156default of 2439.0%

Leader: Muse Wonder Full · 32.6%

reasoning

HLE-Diamond

153 results
  1. #96default of 15313.7%

Leader: Gemini 4 Carbon · 69.1%

knowledge

AA-Omniscience v1.1 Accuracy

123 results
  1. #92default of 12327.2%

Leader: Fable 5.1 · 68.4%

knowledge

AA-Omniscience v1.1 Non-hallucination

123 results
  1. #71default of 12347.8%

Leader: Gemini 4 Carbon · 95.8%

reasoning

Terminal-Bench-Science-AA

126 results
  1. #75default of 1264.3%

Leader: Gemini 4 Carbon · 64.8%

coding

Terminal-Bench v4-AA

241 results
  1. #72default of 24122.7%

Leader: Kimi K3.1 · 67.2%

All 112 benchmarks

show 102 more